PROPOSALS, XX IBC (2024)

List of proposals to amend the International Code of Nomenclature for
algae, fungi, and plants
, submitted to the XX International Botanical
Congress, Madrid, 2024  (was: Rio de Janeiro, 2023).
 
Links to the relevant PDF (copyright IAPT for all material from Taxon)
are either direct (to a local copy), or to a website where the PDF is
accessible.

 
 
Directions

Nicholas J. Turland & John H. Wiersema
    Procedures and timetable for proposals to amend
       the International Code of Nomenclature
          for algae, fungi, and plants
 
Taxon 68: 1372-1373. 2020 [‘2019’]
 
 
Patrick Herendeen & Jiří Kvaček
    International Botanical Congress
       moving to Madrid in 2024
 
Taxon 70:    690-690.   2021
 

 
Proposals

Tae-Young Choi, Dong Chan Son & Soo-Rang Lee
    (001) Proposal to add
       a new Note and Example to illustrate Article 6.11
 
Taxon 69:    623-623.   2020
 
Magnus Lidén
    (002–003) Proposal to change the phrasing of Article 7.2
 
Taxon 69:    623-624.   2020
Pedro B. Schwartsburd, Andreza G.S. Oliveira &
         Nelson T.L. Pena
    (004–005) Proposals to include
       the term “type-species” in the Code
 
 
Taxon 69:    624-624.   2020
 
Siddhartha Singh Deo & Shuvadeep Majumdar
    (006) Recommendation for preserving dissected parts
       of holotype specimens of names of bryophytes
 
Taxon 69:    625-625.   2020
 
Nicholas J. Turland, John H. Wiersema & John McNeill
    (007–008) Proposals to make clearer
       the circumstances under which a holotype can exist
 
Taxon 69:    626-627.   2020
 
Julia Gravendyck, Julien B. Bachelier,
         Wolfram M. Kürschner & Patrick S. Herendeen
    (009) A proposal to solve a paradox
       when neotypifying names of fossil-taxa
 
 
Taxon 69:    628-628.   2020
 
Jefferson Prado, Regina Y. Hirai & Robbin C. Moran
    (010) Proposal to add
       a new Note and a new Example after Article 9.6
 
Taxon 69:    629-629.   2020
 
Gustavo Hassemer, Riccardo M. Baldini, Dirk C. Albach &
         Jefferson Prado
    (011) Proposal to amend the Code regarding
       the selection of illustrations as neotypes
 
 
Taxon 69:    629-630.   2020
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Sangita Dey & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (012) Proposal to modify Article 9.12
 
Taxon 69:    630-630.   2020
Jaideep Mazumdar, Subir Bandyopadhyay &
         Avishek Bhattacharjee
    (013) Proposal to amend Article 9.20
 
Taxon 69:    631-631.   2020
James C. Lendemer
    (014) Proposal to require a statement of
       “demonstrable ambiguity” for epitype designation
 
Taxon 69:    631-631.   2020
 
Tapas Chakrabarty & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (015) Proposal to add
       a new paragraph to Recommendation 9B
          concerning lecto-, neo-, and epitypification
 
Taxon 69:    632-632.   2020
 
 
Mayur D. Nandikar
    (016) Proposal to add
       a new paragraph to Recommendation 9B
 
Taxon 69:    632-632.   2020
 
Anand Kumar, Onkar Nath Maurya &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (017) Proposal to add
       a new Example after Article 11.4
 
 
Taxon 69:    633-633.   2020
 
Nicholas J. Turland, John H. Wiersema & John McNeill
    (018–020) Proposals
       for a clearer and more concise Article 40
          and to resolve conflict
             between Art. 40.6 and Art. 9.10
 
Taxon 69:    633-635.   2020
 
 
 
Gopal Krishna, Avishek Bhattacharjee,
         Subir Bandyopadhyay & Munivenkatappa Sanjappa
    (021) Proposal to amend Recommendation 46C.2
 
 
Taxon 69:    636-636.   2020
Robbin C. Moran, Jefferson Prado, Regina Hirai &
         Fernando B. Matos
    (022) Proposal to modify Article 60.8(a)
 
 
Taxon 69:    636-636.   2020
David J. Mabberley
    (023) Proposal to amend Article 60.8:
       classical Latin adjectival specific epithets
          commemorating persons
 
 
Taxon 69:    637-637.   2020
    -  David J. Mabberley
       The orthographic significance of the Latin name
          for the “Norfolk Island Hibiscus” (Malvaceae)
 
Taxon 67:    792-793.   2018
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (024) Proposal to add a voted Example to Article 60.8
 
Taxon 69:    638-638.   2020
    -  Paul van Rijckevorsel
       (2566) Proposal to conserve
          the name Taxus harringtonia
             (Cephalotaxus harringtonia) (Taxaceae)
                with that spelling
 
Taxon 66:  1471-1471. 2017
 
 
 
    -  Wendy L. Applequist
     “(2566) To conserve Taxus harringtonia ...” in
          Report of the Nomenclature Committee
             for Vascular Plants: 71
 
Taxon 69:    394-394.   2020
Taxon 69:    391-397.   2020
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Gopal Krishna &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (025) Proposal to clarify that a circumscription
       applies to a taxon, not to a name
 
 
Taxon 69:  1379-1379. 2020
 
Jefferson Prado, Regina Y. Hirai & Robbin C. Moran
    (026) Proposal to add
       a new Recommendation after Article 7
          and a new entry to the Glossary
 
Taxon 69:  1379-1380. 2020
 
 
Gunadayalan Gnanasekaran & Wilson Arisdason
    (027) Proposal to amend Recommendation 8A.4
 
Taxon 69:  1380-1380. 2020
Tomoyuki Katagiri & Shuvadeep Majumdar
    (028) Recommendation for prohibiting
       unauthorized division of a type specimen
 
Taxon 69:  1381-1381. 2020
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Subir Bandyopadhyay &
         Debabrata Maity
    (029) Proposal to add
       a new Example after Article 9.1
 
 
Taxon 69:  1382-1382. 2020
 
Michael Wisnev
    (030–033) Proposals
       regarding lectotypes, neotypes, and epitypes
          (amendments to Articles 9 and 10)
 
Taxon 69:  1382-1383. 2020
 
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Monalisa Dey &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (034–035) Proposals to amend
       Article 9.6 and Example 6
 
 
Taxon 69:  1384-1384. 2020
 
Michael Wisnev
    (036–037) Proposals regarding neotypes and epitypes
       (amendment to Articles 9.8 and 9.9)
 
Taxon 69:  1385-1385. 2020
 
Tapas Chakrabarty, Gopal Krishna & Anand Kuma
    (038) Proposal to add
       a new Example under Article 9.17
 
Taxon 69:  1385-1386. 2020
 
Gopal Krishna, Avishek Bhattacharjee &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (039) Proposal to add
       a new paragraph to Recommendation 9A
 
 
Taxon 69:  1386-1386. 2020
 
Wojciech Paul & Beata Paszko
    (040) How to deal with imprecise dates –
       proposal to add a new rule to Article 31
 
Taxon 69:  1386-1387. 2020
 
Cassiano A.D. Welker & Jefferson Prado
    (041) Proposal to amend
       Article 35.2 and add a new Example
 
Taxon 69:  1387-1387. 2020
 
Gopal Krishna, Avishek Bhattacharjee, Wilson Arisdason
         & Subir Bandyopadhya
    (042) Proposal to add
       a new Example under Article 36.1
 
 
Taxon 69:  1388-1388. 2020
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Gopal Krishna &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (043) Proposal to amend
       the definition of “diagnosis” in Article 38.2
 
 
Taxon 69:  1388-1388. 2020
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Sangita Dey &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (044) Proposal to amend Recommendation 40A.1
 
 
Taxon 69:  1389-1389. 2020
Michael Wisnev
    (045–046) Proposals to convert
       Article 41 Example 17 to a voted Example
          and delete Article 41 Example 19
 
Taxon 69:  1389-1390. 2020
 
 
Gopal Krishna, Avishek Bhattacharjee &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (047) Proposal to add a new paragraph
       with a new Example to Recommendation 50D
 
 
Taxon 69:  1390-1390. 2020
 
Robbin C. Moran & Jefferson Prado
    (048) Proposal
       to amend Article 60.8 and Example 17,
          and add an associated new Glossary entry
 
Taxon 69:  1391-1391. 2020
 
 
Jefferson Prado & Robbin C. Moran
    (049) Proposal to amend Article 60.11
       and its Examples, and to add a new Example
 
Taxon 69:  1392-1392. 2020
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Ruma Bhadra &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (050) Proposal to amend
       the definition of “synonym” in the Glossary
 
 
Taxon 69:  1393-1393. 2020
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (051–052) Proposals on the retroactivity of Division III
 
Taxon 70:    448-448.   2021
Vijai Malik, Lalita Saini, Archasvi Tyagi &
         Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (053–054) Proposals to clarify Art. 6 Note 2
       and add a new Example concerning isonyms
          published by the same author
 
 
Taxon 70:    448-449.   2021
 
 
Michael Wisnev
    (055–064) Proposals
       to clarify Articles 6.9–6.13 and Article 41
 
Taxon 70:    449-451.   2021
 
Brian J. Tindall
    (065) Proposal to amend Article 7.2
       and add a definition of “typify”to the Glossary
 
Taxon 70:    451-451.   2021
 
Michael Wisnev
    (066–068) Proposals
       regarding type designation requirements
          (amendments to Articles 7 and 9)
 
Taxon 70:    452-452.   2021
 
 
Susanne S. Renner
    (069) Recommendation for adding
       photographs of type specimens to the protologues
          of new names of taxa at the rank of species or below
 
Taxon 70:    452-453.   2021
 
 
Adriel Ian Jocou
    (070) Proposal to add
       a new Example after Article 9 Note 6 to illustrate
          when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
 
Taxon 70:    453-453.   2021
 
 
Sneha P. Bramhadande & Mayur D. Nandikar
    (071) Proposal for accountability in designating types
       based on virtually seen original material
 
Taxon 70:    453-454.   2021
 
Jefferson Prado, Regina Y. Hirai & Robbin C. Moran
    (072) Proposal to clarify Article 20.3
       concerning the form of a generic name,
          to amend its Examples and to add a new Example
 
Taxon 70:    454-454.   2021
 
 
Mark A. Garland
    (073–075) Proposals to clarify
       the status of epithets in the ablative case
 
Taxon 70:    455-455.   2021
 
    -  Mark A. Garland
       Is Solanum fructu-tecto validly published?
          Article 23 and epithets in the ablative case
 
Taxon 70:    648-652.   2021
 
José Floriano Barêa Pastore, Michelle Mota &
         Jefferson Prado
    (076–077) Proposals to amend
       Article 38.4, to extend its application
          to an illustration with analysis,
              and to add a new Article with a new Example
 
 
Taxon 70:    456-456.   2021
 
 
 
Duilio Iamonico, John McNeill & Emanuele Del Guacchio
    (078) Proposal to add a new Example
       of an indirect reference after Article 38.14
 
Taxon 70:    457-457.   2021
 
Gunadayalan Gnanasekaran & Wilson Arisdason
    (079) Proposal to convert
       Recommendation 41A.1 into an Article
 
Taxon 70:    457-458.   2021
 
Gideon F. Smith
    (080) Proposal to amend
       Article H.5.2 concerning a nothotaxon
          with parent taxa at unequal ranks
 
Taxon 70:    458-458.   2021
 
 
John H. Wiersema, Jefferson Prado & Nicholas J. Turland
    (081–082) Proposals to allow the use of a hyphen
       to be treated as a correctable error
          in all nothogeneric names
             that are condensed formulas
 
Taxon 70:    459-459.   2021
 
 
 
Michael Wisnev
    (083–087) Proposals to amend Article 10
       concerning the typification of generic names
 
Taxon 70:    908-909.   2021
 
Viktor O. Nachychko
    (088–090) Proposals to amend
       Articles 7.11, 9.23 and 40.6
          to clarify equivalence to their terms
 
Taxon 70:  1378-1378. 2021
 
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
    (091–092) Proposals to amend Recommendation 7A
       on deposition of typematerial
          in institutions of countries of origin,
             and to add a new Recommendation 51A
                regarding avoiding potentially inappropriate
                   or unacceptable names of taxa
 
Taxon 70:  1379-1380. 2021
 
 
 
 
 
    -  Peter J. de Lange, Sergei L. Mosyakin,
           Shannel P. Courtney & Te Ahu Rei
       (2789) Proposal to conserve the name
          Pomaderris kumarahou (Rhamnaceae)
             with that spelling
 
 
Taxon 69:  1373-1375. 2020
 
 
Susanne S. Renner
    (093–096) Proposals to permit
       nuclear DNA sequences as nomenclatural types
          when preservation of specimens is not feasible
 
Taxon 70:  1380-1381. 2021
 
 
Michael Wisnev & Jefferson Prado
    (097–100) Proposals to clarify Articles 8.2 and 8.3
       and their footnotes with regard to
          specimens, gatherings and duplicates
 
Taxon 70:  1381-1382. 2021
 
 
Michael Wisnev
    (101–106) Proposals to clarify rules
       referring to types designated or indicated
          and to extend Article 9.2 to other kinds of types
 
Taxon 70:  1382-1384. 2021
 
 
Elton John de Lírio, Ariane Luna Peixoto,
         Joelcio Freitas & Anderson Alves-Araújo
    (107) Proposal to add an Example to Article 9.9
       for when not to designatean epitype
 
 
Taxon 70:  1384-1384. 2021
 
Bastian Steudel
    (108–109) Proposals to amend Articles 9.9 and 9.20
       to allow more than one epitype
 
Taxon 70:  1385-1385. 2021
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee, Subir Bandyopadhyay &
         Dinesh Kumar Agrawala
    (110) Proposal to add a new Note to Article 9
       to clarify the status of duplicates of types
 
 
Taxon 70:  1386-1386. 2021
 
Shuvadeep Majumdar
    (111) Proposal to amend
       Article 20.3, with adjustment to Article 60,
          to eliminate hyphens from all generic names
 
Taxon 70:  1386-1387. 2021
 
 
Yohan Pillon & Helen C.F. Hopkins
    (112–113) Proposals to amend
       Recommendations 20A.1 and 23A.3
          to expand the diversity of new generic names
             and epithets
 
Taxon 70:  1387-1388. 2021
 
 
 
Rohan Maity & Sudhansu Sekhar Dash
    (114) Proposal to amend
       Article 23.2 and Recommendation 23A.3
          to eliminate arbitrary formation of,
             and future use of hyphens in,
                specific epithets
 
Taxon 70:  1388-1389. 2021
 
 
 
 
Mark A. Garland & Jefferson Prado
    (115) Proposal to amend
       Article 23.5 and add a new Example
          to include specific epithets that consist of a noun
             and its accompanying adjective
                in the genitive case
 
Taxon 70:  1389-1389. 2021
 
 
 
 
Suchandra Dutta & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (116) Proposal to amend
       Recommendation 31B on precisely indicating
          the date of effective publication
 
Taxon 70:  1390-1390. 2021
 
 
Subir Bandyopadhyay, Gopal Krishna &
         Avishek Bhattacharjee
    (117) Proposal to add
       a new paragraph to Recommendation 40A
          encouraging the publication of accessory types
             and type illustrations
 
 
Taxon 70:  1390-1391. 2021
 
 
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
    (118) Proposal to amend Article 41.5
       and add an Example clarifying requirements
          for referring to a basionym or replaced synonym
 
Taxon 70:  1391-1392. 2021
 
 
Timothy A. Hammer & Kevin R. Thiele
    (119–122) Proposals to amend Articles 51 and 56
       and Division III,
          to allow the rejection of culturally offensive
             and inappropriate names
 
Taxon 70:  1392-1394. 2021
 
 
 
    -  Gideon F. Smith & Estrela Figueiredo
          Rhodes-” must fall:
             Some of the consequences of colonialism
                for botany and plant nomenclature
 
Taxon 71:        1-5.       2021 [‘2022’]
 
 
    -  Sergei L. Mosyakin
          If “Rhodes-” must fall, who shall fall next?
 
Taxon 71:    249-255.   2022
    -  Gideon F. Smith, Estrela Figueiredo,
          Timothy A. Hammer & Kevin R. Thiele
          Dealing with inappropriate honorifics
             in a structured and defensible way is possible
 
 
Taxon 71:    933-935.   2022
 
    -  Sergei L. Mosyakin
          Defending Art. 51 of the Code:
             Comments on Smith & al. (2022)
 
Taxon 71:  1141-1150. 2022
 
    -  Kevin R. Thiele, Gideon F. Smith, Estrela Figueiredo
          & Timothy A. Hammer
          Taxonomists have an opportunity
             to rid botanical nomenclature
                of inappropriate honorifics
                   in a structured and defensible way
 
 
Taxon 71:  1151-1154. 2022
 
 
 
    -  Sergei L. Mosyakin
          Attempts to introduce a system of national,
             racial and/or ethnocultural discrimination
                in codes of biological nomenclature
                   should not be tolerated:
                      Comments on some recent proposals
                         (Wright & Gillman, 2022, etc.)
 
Taxon 72:  0000-0000. 2023
 
 
 
 
 
    -  Shane Donald Wright & Len Norman Gillman
          Reply to
             “Attempts to introduce a system of national,
                racial and/or ethnocultural discrimination
                   in codes of biological nomenclature
                      should not be tolerated:
                         Comments on some recent proposals
                            (Wright & Gillman, 2022, etc.)”
 
Taxon 72:  0000-0000. 2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (123–125) Proposals
       on the retroactivity of conservation
 
Taxon 70:  1394-1395. 2021
 
Gideon F. Smith & Estrela Figueiredo
    (126) Proposal to add a new Article 61.6
       to permanently and retroactively eliminate epithets
          with the root caf[e]r- or caff[e]r- from
             the nomenclature of algae, fungi and plants
 
Taxon 70:  1395-1396. 2021
 
 
 
    -  Len Norman Gillman & Shane Donald Wright
       Restoring indigenous names in taxonomy
 
Commun. Biol. 3:609  3pp.  2020
    -  Sandra Knapp, Maria S. Vorontsova &
          Nicholas J. Turland
       Indigenous species names in algae, fungi and plants:
          A comment on Gillman & Wright (2020)
 
 
Taxon 69:  1409-1410. 2020
 
    -  Ricardo L. Palma & Allen C.G. Heath
       Science versus vernacular:
          should some taxa of animals and plants
             be renamed according to ‘indigenous’ practices?
 
Bionomina 22:  32–38. 2021
 
 
Special-purpose Committee on
         Virtual Participation in the Nomenclature Section
    (127–135) Proposals to add new Provisions
       and Recommendations to Division III
          of the International Code of Nomenclature
             for algae, fungi, and plants
                related to virtual participation
                   in the Nomenclature Section
 
 
Taxon 70:  1397-1398. 2021
 
 
 
 
 
    -  Members of the Special-purpose Committee:
          Leslie R. Landrum (Secretary),
             Renée Fortunato (Convener),
                Mary Barkworth, Ilse Breitwieser,
                   Sebsebe Demissew, Ali A. Dönmez,
                      Suchandra Dutta, Alina Freire-Fierro,
                         Young-Dong Kim, Blanca León,
                            Gerry Moore, Sergei L. Mosyakin,
                               Sang-Hun Oh, Carlos Parra-O.,
                                  Jefferson Prado, Lourdes Rico Arce,
                               Alexander N. Sennikov &
                            Gideon F. Smith
       Report of the Special-purpose Committee on
          Virtual Participation
             in the Nomenclature Section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxon 70:  1399-1401. 2021
 
 
John McNeill, Nicholas J. Turland, John H. Wiersema,
         Fred R. Barrie & Werner Greuter
    (136–137) Proposals
       to clarify the definition of “illustration”
 
 
Taxon 71:   703-703.    2022
 
Michael Wisnev
    (138–141) Proposals
       regarding types and supersession
          (amendments to Articles 7.2–7.4, 8.1, and 10.9,
             and a new Note after Article 9.19)
 
Taxon 71:   704-704.    2022
 
 
 
Julia Gravendyck, Robert A. Fensome, Martin J. Head,
         Patrick S. Herendeen, James B. Riding &
            Nicholas J. Turland
    (142–148) Proposals to improve
       the definition, utility, and curation of
          (type)specimens of fossil algae, fungi, and plants
 
 
 
Taxon 71:   705-706.    2022
 
 
    -  Julia Gravendyck, Robert A. Fensome, Martin J. Head,
          Patrick S. Herendeen, James B. Riding,
             Julien B. Bachelier & Nicholas J. Turland
       Taxonomy and nomenclature in palaeopalynology:
          basic principles, current challenges
             and future perspectives
 
 
 
Palynology 45: 717-743. 2021
 
 
Avishek Bhattacharjee & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (149) Proposal to add
       an Example under Article 8 Note 1 to show
          that an apparent collecting number does not
             necessarily denote the same gathering
 
Taxon 71:   707-707.    2022
 
 
 
Sarang Ashok Bokil
    (150) Proposal to add
       a Recommendation on type specimens of taxa
          with microscopic distinguishing characters
 
Taxon 71:   707-707.    2022
 
 
Jefferson Prado, Regina Y. Hirai, James C. Lendemer
         & Robbin C. Moran
    (151) Proposal
       to add the concept of “typotype” to the Code
 
 
Taxon 71:   708-708.    2022
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (152–153) Proposals to remove
       an unintended restriction on the typification
          of genera and subdivisions of genera
 
Taxon 71:   708-709.    2022
 
 
Jefferson Prado, Nicholas J. Turland & John McNeill
    (154) Proposal to clarify
       the meaning of “based on” in Article 14.4
 
Taxon 71:   709-709.    2022
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (155) Proposal to disallow descriptive names
       for subdivisions of families
 
Taxon 71:   710-710.    2022
 
Alex S. George
    (156–158) Proposals to amend Articles 23 and 24
       to cover the use of adverbs
 
Taxon 71:   710-711.    2022
 
Jefferson Prado, Nicholas J. Turland & John McNeill
    (159) Proposal to add
       a new Note and Example in Article 30
          concerning retracted electronic publications
 
Taxon 71:   711-711.    2022
 
 
Rohan Maity & Sudhansu Sekhar Dash
    (160) Proposal to convert
       Recommendation 40A.5 to a new Article
          dealing with deposition of type specimens
             for valid publication of names of new taxa
 
Taxon 71:   712-712.    2022
 
 
 
Gideon F. Smith
    (161) Proposal to expand the functions
       of the General Committee
          to include the appointment
             of Special-purpose Committees
                between International Botanical
                   and Mycological Congresses
 
Taxon 71:   713-713.    2022
 
 
 
 
 
Jefferson Prado & Robbin C. Moran
    (162) Proposal to add “first-step typification”
       and “second-step typification” to the Glossary
 
Taxon 71:   713-713.    2022
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin & John McNeill
    (163–164) Proposals to amend Article 8 Ex. 3
       and to add a new Note to Article 38,
          with comments on “types” represented
             by two or several gatherings
 
Taxon 71:  1325-1326.  2022
 
 
 
Yun Lin & Qian Sun
    (165) Proposal to amend Article 9.2
       to allow correction of errors in the designation
          of lectotypes and neotypes as well as holotypes
 
Taxon 71:  1326-1327.  2022
 
 
Thiago E.C. Meneguzzo, Cássio van den Berg &
         Jefferson Prado
    (166) Proposal to add a new Note
       and two new Examples after Article 9.12
          to clarify which type specimens change or retain
             their status upon designation of a lectotype
 
 
Taxon 71:  1327-1327.  2022
 
 
 
Sutrishna Kar & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (167) Proposal to add a new paragraph
       to Recommendation 9B on designation of a neotype
          from the locality of a replaced type
 
Taxon 71:  1328-1328.  2022
 
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (168–169) Proposals on type indications
       that do not typify (yet, or any more)
 
Taxon 71:  1328-1329.  2022
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (170–174) Proposal to revise Article 10.2,
       and some further implications
 
Taxon 71:  1329-1330.  2022
 
Thiago E.C. Meneguzzo & Jefferson Prado
    (175) Proposal to amend Article 14.1
       to allow conservation of names
          of subdivisions of genera and of infraspecific taxa
 
Taxon 71:  1331-1331.  2022
 
 
Nicholas J. Turland & John H. Wiersema
    (176) Proposal to protect the places of publication
       of family names listed in Appendix IIB
 
Taxon 71:  1332-1333.  2022
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
    (177) Proposal to amend Recommendation 23A.3
       with the advice not to dedicate species to persons
          quite unconnected with botany, mycology,
             phycology, or natural science in general
 
Taxon 71:  1333-1333.  2022
 
 
 
Alexander B. Doweld
    (178) Proposal to exclude electronic material
       with preliminary pagination
          from effective publication
 
Taxon 71:  1334-1335.  2022
 
 
José Floriano Barêa Pastore, Danielle Remor,
         Michelle Mota & Jefferson Prado
    (179) Proposal to add, after Article 38.5,
       a new Example showing generic and specific names
          simultaneously validly published
             through an illustration with analysis
 
 
Taxon 71:  1336-1336.  2022
 
 
 
William J. Woelkerling & Øjvind Moestrup
    (180–183) Proposals to amend Article 40.1
       and Article 44.1 and to add a new Article 44.3
          and a Note to facilitate the valid publication
             of names of “dinoflagellates”
 
Taxon 71:  1337-1338.  2022
 
 
 
Anand Kumar & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (184) Proposal to amend Article 41.5
       to account for missing or preliminary page numbers
 
Taxon 71:  1338-1339.  2022
 
John H. Wiersema, Melanie Schori & John McNeill
    (185) Proposal to amend Article 48.2 to improve
       its parallel construction in relation to Article 52.2
 
Taxon 71:  1339-1340.  2022
 
John McNeill, Werner Greuter & Helen Hartley
    (186–187) Proposals to add a new provision
       in Article 60 to establish that epithets
          formed from abbreviations of personal names
             are considered to be composed arbitrarily
                and the termination of such epithets
                   is not subject to standardization,
                      and to clarify Article 60.14
 
Taxon 71:  1340-1341.  2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
John McNeill, Vincent Demoulin, Werner Greuter,
         Jefferson Prado, Fred R. Barrie, David J. Mabberley,
            Valéry Malécot, Karol Marhold & Karen L. Wilson
    (188–191) Four proposals to clarify the rules on gender
 
 
 
Taxon 71:  1342-1343.  2022
Veronica Malavasi & Pavel Skaloud
    (192) Insert a new Chapter E
       in Division II on a Code of Ethics
 
Taxon 71:  1343-1344.  2022
 
Gideon F. Smith, Estrela Figueiredo, Gerry Moore,
         Leslie R. Landrum, Roy E. Gereau, Jefferson Prado,
            Sebsebe Demissew, Wendy Applequist,
               Alejandro Quintanar, Renée Fortunato,
                  Alina Freire-Fierro, Jun Wen & Yun-Fei Deng
    (193) Proposal to democratize
       aspects of the governance of the International Code
          of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants
 
 
 
 
 
Taxon 71:  1344-1345.  2022
 
 
John H. Wiersema
    (194) Proposal to readdress the issue
       of whether or not
          the types of basionyms or replaced synonyms
             of conserved names with conserved types
                are themselves conserved
 
Taxon 71:  1345-1346.  2022
 
 
 
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
    (195) Proposal to amend the Preamble by adding
       a “potentially sensitive content disclaimer
          and limitation of liability”
 
Taxon 72:    442-443.   2023
 
 
Michael Wisnev
    (196–197) Proposals
       regarding unpublished materials
          (amendments to Article 6.1
             and the footnote of Article 6.13)
 
Taxon 72:    443-443.   2023
 
 
 
Shuvadeep Majumdar, Subir Bandyopadhyay &
         Tapas Chakrabarty
    (198–199) Proposals to disallow doubtful equivalents
       of “designated here” under Article 7.11
          and to recommend that permissible equivalents
             be in the Latin alphabet
 
 
Taxon 72:    444-444.   2023
 
 
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin & Zoya M. Tsymbalyuk
    (200) Proposal to amend
       the definition of the word “duplicate”
          in the footnote to Article 8.3
 
Taxon 72:    444-445.   2023
 
 
Michael Wisnev
    (201–202) Proposals regarding
       the definition of original material (Article 9.4)
 
Taxon 72:    445-446.   2023
 
Michael J. Stephan
    (203–205) Proposals
       to require initial lowercase letters for specific
          and infraspecific epithets,
             to permit tautonyms non-retroactively,
                and to use consistent language
                   in Articles 20.1 and 23.2
 
Taxon 72:    446-447.   2023
 
 
 
 
 
Juan Carlos Zamora
    (206) Proposal
       to guide the choice among grammatical forms
          in epithets with uncertain grammatical status
 
Taxon 72:    447-448.   2023
 
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (207–216) Proposals on orthography:
       Epithets in apposition, and more
 
Taxon 72:    448-451.   2023
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin, John McNeill & Natalia M. Shiyan
    (217) Proposal to amend Article 38.4
       to allow binding decisions
          on whether a name was accepted
             by its author(s) in the original publication
 
Taxon 72:    452-453.   2023
 
 
 
Jefferson Prado, Wendy Applequist, Karen L. Wilson,
         Karol Marhold, Valéry Malécot, John H. Wiersema,
            Werner Greuter, Patrick S. Herendeen,
               John McNeill, Juan Carlos Zamora &
                  Anna M. Monro
    (218–220) Proposals
       to authorize binding decisions to be implemented
          upon General Committee approval
             of a recommendation, subject to ratification
                by a later International Botanical Congress
 
 
 
 
 
Taxon 72:    453-454.   2023
 
 
 
 
Vera P. Hayova, Ganna V. Boiko & Sergei L. Mosyakin
    (221) Proposal to add
       a new Recommendation after Article 38,
          with the advice to report local/indigenous
             vernacular names (if available) of new taxa
                and to use such names, if appropriate,
                   in scientific nomenclature
 
Taxon 72:    455-455.   2023
 
 
 
 
 
Michael Wisnev & Jefferson Prado
    (222) Proposal to amend Article 40.4
       to avoid an unintended conflict with Article 40.2
 
Taxon 72:    455-456.   2023
 
Anand Kumar & Subir Bandyopadhyay
    (223–224) Proposals
       to remove redundancy in Recommendation 40A
          concerning indication of type
 
Taxon 72:    456-456.   2023
 
 
Michael Wisnev
    (225–226) Proposals to more clearly provide
       the date limitations in Article 41
 
Taxon 72:    457-457.   2023
 
Michelle Mota, José Floriano Barêa Pastore &
         Jefferson Prado
    (227) Proposal to permit a binding decision
       on whether or not an indirect reference
          to a basionym or replaced synonym
             is sufficient for valid publication of a name
 
 
Taxon 72:    457-458.   2023
 
 
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (228–232) Proposals on orthography:
       Diacritical signs
 
Taxon 72:    458-459.   2023
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    (233–240) Proposals on orthography:
       Epithets honouring persons
 
Taxon 72:    459-461.   2023
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin & John McNeill
    (241) Proposal to amend Article H.11.1
       by additionally allowing a combination
          of the name of a hybridogenous genus
             and a nothospecific epithet
                for naming a nothospecies of which
                   the postulated or known parent species
                      belong to different genera
 
Taxon 72:    461-462.   2023
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Miscellaneous papers

David J. Mabberley
    The orthographic significance of the Latin name
       for the “Norfolk Island Hibiscus” (Malvaceae)
 
Taxon 67:   792-793.   2018
 
George Staples & Jefferson Prado
    Clarification is needed in the Code
       for the nomenclatural status
          of type specimen photographs
 
Taxon 67:   833-835.   2018
 
 
Gideon F. Smith, Melanie Schori & Karen L. Wilson
    The history, establishment, and functioning
       of Special-purpose Committees under the
          International Code of Nomenclature
             for algae, fungi, and plants
 
Taxon 68: 1082-1092. 2020 [‘2019’]
 
 
 
James C. Lendemer
    Epitypes are forever:
       Best practices for an increasingly
          misused nomenclatural action
 
Taxon 69:   849-850.   2020
 
 
    -  Kevin D. Hyde & Ying Zhang
       Epitypification: should we epitypify?
J. Zhejiang Univ., Sci. B
              9:   842-846.   2008
    -  Per M. Jørgensen
       Notes on the new Example 9 in Article 9.8 of
          the International Code of Nomenclature for algae,
             fungi, and plants
 
Taxon 63:    132-133.   2014
 
 
    -  Hiran A. Ariyawansa, David L. Hawksworth,
          Kevin D. Hyde, E.B. Gareth Jones,
             Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura,
                Dimuthu S. Manamgoda,
                   Kasun M. Thambugala,
                      Dhanushka Udayanga, Erio Camporesi,
                         Anupama Daranagama,
                            Ruvishika Jayawardena, Jian-Kui Liu,
                               Eric H.C. McKenzie,
                                  Rungtiwa Phookamsak,
                               Indunil C. Senanayake,
                            Roger G. Shivas, Qing Tian &
                         Jian-Chu Xu
       Epitypification and neotypification:
          guidelines with appropriate
             and inappropriate examples
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fungal Diversity 69: 57-91. 2014
 
 
    -  Sergei L. Mosyakin & John McNeill
       On the nomenclature of Chenopodium pallidum
          and Atriplex schugnanica
             (Chenopodiaceae / Amaranthaceae sensu APG)
                and the perils of epitypification
 
Phytotaxa 376: 133-137. 2018
 
 
 
Paul van Rijckevorsel
    On presenting nomenclatural status
 
Taxon 70:    644-647.   2021
Mark A. Garland
    Is Solanum fructu-tecto validly published?
          Article 23 and epithets in the ablative case
 
Taxon 70:    648-652.   2021
 
Richard M. Bateman & William A. DiMichele
    Escaping the voluntary constraints
          of “tyre-track” taxonomy
 
Taxon 70:  1062-1077. 2021
 
Gideon F. Smith & Estrela Figueiredo
    Rhodes-” must fall:
          Some of the consequences of colonialism
             for botany and plant nomenclature
 
Taxon 71:        1-5.       2021 [‘2022’]
 
 
Shane Donald Wright & Len Norman Gillman
    Replacing current nomenclature with
          pre-existing indigenous names
             in algae, fungi and plants
 
Taxon 71:        6-10.     2021 [‘2022’]
 
 
    -  Len Norman Gillman & Shane Donald Wright
       Restoring indigenous names in taxonomy
 
Commun. Biol. 3:609  3pp.  2020
    -  Sandra Knapp, Maria S. Vorontsova &
          Nicholas J. Turland
       Indigenous species names in algae, fungi and plants:
          A comment on Gillman & Wright (2020)
 
 
Taxon 69:  1409-1410. 2020
 
    -  Ricardo L. Palma & Allen C.G. Heath
       Science versus vernacular:
          should some taxa of animals and plants
             be renamed according to ‘indigenous’ practices?
 
Bionomina 22:  32–38. 2021
 
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
       If “Rhodes-” must fall, who shall fall next?
 
Taxon 71:    249-255.   2022
Gideon F. Smith, Estrela Figueiredo, Timothy A. Hammer
       & Kevin R. Thiele
       Dealing with inappropriate honorifics
          in a structured and defensible way is possible
 
 
Taxon 71:    933-935.   2022
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
       Defending Art. 51 of the Code:
          Comments on Smith & al. (2022)
 
Taxon 71:  1141-1150. 2022
 
Kevin R. Thiele, Gideon F. Smith, Estrela Figueiredo
          & Timothy A. Hammer
       Taxonomists have an opportunity
          to rid botanical nomenclature
             of inappropriate honorifics
                in a structured and defensible way
 
 
Taxon 71:  1151-1154. 2022
 
 
 
Sergei L. Mosyakin
       Attempts to introduce a system of national,
          racial and/or ethnocultural discrimination
             in codes of biological nomenclature
                should not be tolerated:
                   Comments on some recent proposals
                      (Wright & Gillman, 2022, etc.)
 
Taxon 72:  0000-0000. 2023
 
 
 
 
 
Shane Donald Wright & Len Norman Gillman
       Reply to
          “Attempts to introduce a system of national,
             racial and/or ethnocultural discrimination
                in codes of biological nomenclature
                   should not be tolerated:
                      Comments on some recent proposals
                         (Wright & Gillman, 2022, etc.)”
 
Taxon 72:  0000-0000. 2023
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
2017 ©, Paul van Rijckevorsel
 
Most recent update:  April 2023